Before you hire,
automate.
Paste any job description — a role you're hiring for, or your own — and see how much of it AI can already do, what it costs, and what's left for a human. About 60 seconds.
Digital Marketing Manager
"Half this $84k role is paid-media reporting and creative ops a $400/mo stack already runs. Save ~$45,000/yr."
- Daily campaign reporting20%Auto now
- Creative request intake & briefs15%w/ setup
- Budget pacing & alerts10%Auto now
- A/B test analysis12%w/ setup
- Strategy review with client18%Human
- Agency & designer coordination15%Human
- New-channel exploration10%Human
No upfront payment. You pay once it's working.
We've spent the past several months building AI and automation systems with Claude Code and modern automation tools for real businesses. We're now opening that up more broadly.
No upfront payment. No deposit. We build your automations, you see them working, and you pay once they're delivered and running. Nothing to pay to get started — just book a call.
Built for founders, operators, and hiring managers.
The hiring vs automation decision, made with evidence instead of instinct.
Know whether your next hire is a person or a $400/mo stack — before you commit to the salary.
Turn a vague role into a concrete list of workflows you can actually build this month.
Walk into the headcount conversation with the math, not a gut feeling.
What one report can surface.
Illustrative example, not a guarantee — your automation ROI depends on the role, salary, and stack you paste in.
Common roles, scored.
Averages from JDs we've scored. Wondering if AI can replace this role at your company? Paste yours and find out.
What you get.
Grounded in your actual task list and how you weight each one — not vibes.
Built on the tools you already pay for. Trigger, steps, human checkpoint, cost, failure modes.
Rewritten JD, new title, salary band direction, the workflows the new hire will operate.
Questions.
How accurate is the automation score?
The score comes from breaking your JD into concrete tasks, scoring each one against real, current tools, and weighting it by how much time the task takes. It's a defensible estimate, not a vibe — paste the same role twice and you'll get the same answer. Treat it as a strong starting point for the decision, not a promise.
What do I actually get in the report?
A task-by-task breakdown of the role, a build blueprint for every automatable workflow (trigger, steps, tools, cost, and failure modes), the full money math, and a rewritten job description for the leaner role you should actually post. It's specific enough to hand to a technical generalist and start building.
Do you build the automations for me?
If you want. Every report has a "Book a call" option — our team can design and deploy the workflows on your stack, done-for-you and handed over. No upfront payment: you pay once they're delivered and running.
Is my data private?
Your job description is processed for one purpose: generating your report. It isn't sold, shared, or used to train any model, and your report is private to you.
What if the role genuinely needs a human?
Overhire exists to answer one question honestly — should I hire an employee, or automate the work? When the role is genuinely human, the report says so plainly: a low score with the human-required tasks called out and the reason for each. That honesty is what makes the high scores worth trusting.
How much does this cost?
The report is free — generate as many as you like. If you want us to build the automations, there's no upfront payment and no deposit: you pay once they're delivered and running. Book a call and we'll scope it with you.
Your JD stays yours.
The job description you paste is processed for one purpose: generating your report. We don't sell it, we don't share it, and we don't use it to train any model. Reports are private to the person who bought them. That's the whole policy — no fine print, and no compliance badges we haven't earned.